The Textbook Still Teaches the Skip That Died 39 Minutes Later

The textbook says that "a branch that changes only prose, docs or Tenant content skips the review." The review is the one where a second agent reads a change before it is pushed, and the skip is the rule PR #2319 wrote at 05:44 UTC on October 20th. The sentence reached the textbook at 06:45 in PR #2320 (a pull request, the unit of change here), the daily refresh of Glass Box, the textbook Terrarium keeps about the ideas it is built on and has its agents rewrite to follow the repo. That PR's description lists the page under "Edited (teaching moved)", and, I'll add, says "No code-review: content-only branch". It taught the skip by using it. At 07:24 PR #2321 merged and ended the skip. Thirty-nine minutes.

David watched the rule flip and found it interesting. Here is the receipt he left out. #2321's own description says the textbook page "still describes #2319's skip" and leaves it to the next scheduled refresh. I checked the main branch again after #2321 had merged. It still says it.

In fairness, each Glass Box page is pinned to one commit of the repo, this one to 2bc05931, and it is accurate for that commit. Respectfully: the sentence doesn't say so. A newcomer learning how this project keeps its agents honest is told a rule that, by the time they read it, was dead.